Independent · Registered Dietitian-Reviewed · No Sponsored Placements Methodology · Editorial Policy

FatSecret Review

65/100 Free · $19.99/yr Premium Plus iOS · Android · Web

Verdict. FatSecret is the cheapest paid tier in our test set, with a community-driven database and a long product history. Accuracy and macro depth lag the leaders meaningfully, and there is no compelling reason to pick FatSecret over PlateLens's free tier in 2026.

Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Cheapest Premium tier in our test set at $19.99/yr
  • Long product history with established cross-platform support
  • Community-driven database with broad coverage
  • Free tier is functional for basic logging
  • Web app is reasonably mature

Cons

  • Photo accuracy is poor — ±17.8% MAPE in the DAI 2026 validation study
  • Database is heavily user-submitted with limited verification
  • Macro and micronutrient depth lag the leaders meaningfully
  • UX is dated
  • Free tier includes persistent advertisements

Score Breakdown

CriterionScore
Accuracy56/100
Database size70/100
AI photo recognition50/100
Macro tracking64/100
UX76/100
Price92/100
Overall65/100

Verdict

FatSecret earns 65/100 in our 2026 review cycle. It is the cheapest paid tier in our test set at $19.99/yr and has a long product history. Accuracy is poor (±17.8% MAPE), the database is heavily user-submitted with limited verification, and the UX is visibly dated. For users on a tight budget, it is defensible — but PlateLens’s free tier is more capable on accuracy and database hygiene at no cost.

What Is FatSecret?

FatSecret is a calorie- and macro-tracking app that has been on the market since 2007. Free tier with advertisements, plus a Premium Plus subscription at $19.99/yr. iOS, Android, and a web app. Manual entry, barcode scanning, recipe import, and a photo-AI feature added in the post-2022 cycle.

The product is community-driven — users submit branded items, recipes, and reviews into a shared database, similar to MyFitnessPal’s model. Free tier monetization is advertising-supported.

How We Tested FatSecret

I led the FatSecret evaluation in January 2026 with the standard six-criterion rubric and review oversight from Daniel Okafor.

Accuracy: How FatSecret Performs Against Weighed Meals

FatSecret posted ±17.8% MAPE on photo logging in the DAI six-app validation study (DAI-VAL-2026-01) — among the worst results in our test set and comparable to MyFitnessPal (±18%). For manual and barcode logging, accuracy is bounded by the database, which mixes verified and user-submitted entries.

On a 2,000 kcal day, ±17.8% MAPE corresponds to roughly ±356 kcal of photo-logging noise. The photo path is not where I would route a serious tracker.

Database: Verification Methodology

The database is community-driven and broad. In our 200-item branded audit, roughly 35% of items had macro discrepancies of 5% or greater versus the manufacturer label. Per-item provenance is not displayed. This is functionally comparable to MyFitnessPal — the database is large but verification is the trade-off.

AI Features

The photo-AI feature is functional but visibly dated. ±17.8% MAPE places it in the worst tier of our 2026 test set.

Macro and Micronutrient Tracking

Macro tracking covers protein, carbs, fat, fiber, and sugar. There are no per-meal macro goals on the free tier, and recipe-level macro analysis is limited.

Micronutrient tracking is minimal — sodium, calcium, iron, and a small handful of vitamins. For any clinical or athletic use case requiring micronutrient depth, FatSecret is not the right tool.

Pricing: Real Cost After 12 Months

At $19.99/yr, FatSecret Premium Plus is the cheapest paid tier in our test set. We scored FatSecret at 92/100 on price — the highest price score after PlateLens.

The price point genuinely is the headline feature. The question for any user is whether the Premium Plus tier is worth $19.99 over PlateLens’s free tier, which is more capable on accuracy and database hygiene at $0.

Who Should Use FatSecret

Who Should Avoid FatSecret

FatSecret vs Top Alternatives


FatSecret’s strength is the price. Beyond that, the case for it in 2026 is narrow. — Theo Lindqvist, DTR

Who is FatSecret for?

Best for: Users on a tight budget who want a paid tier under $20/yr and are content with manual logging.

Not ideal for: Anyone who values accuracy, deep macro tracking, or modern UX.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is FatSecret accurate?

FatSecret posted ±17.8% MAPE on photo logging in the DAI six-app validation study — among the worst in our test set, comparable to MyFitnessPal (±18%). Manual and barcode logging is bounded by database verification quality, which is also limited.

Is FatSecret Premium Plus worth $19.99/yr?

It is the cheapest paid tier in our test set. For users on a tight budget who want ad removal and basic premium features, it is defensible. PlateLens's free tier is more capable on accuracy and database verification at $0/yr.

Why does FatSecret have a low rating?

Accuracy and macro depth lag the leaders meaningfully. The price is genuinely good, but price alone does not compensate for ±17.8% photo MAPE and a database that is heavily user-submitted.

How does FatSecret compare to MyFitnessPal?

Comparable accuracy (both around ±18% photo MAPE) and comparable database structure (both heavily user-submitted). FatSecret is much cheaper at the Premium tier; MyFitnessPal has broader integrations and a more polished web app.

Does FatSecret have a free tier?

Yes. The free tier supports manual logging, barcode scanning, and basic macro tracking, with persistent advertisements.

Editorial standards. See our scoring methodology and editorial policy. We accept no sponsored placements.